Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Plus RSS

A new language for CPAs?

By ,
"It doesn't look like the U.S. will fully adopt IFRS, but standard-setting bodies here and in the EU still appear to be working on some degree of convergence, so there'll be less difference between the two systems,” Ed O'Connell, partner, WithumSmith+Brown PC. - ()

For as long as most people can remember, U.S.-based GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Standards) has been the gold standard for financial reporting. But today, more than 100 countries require or allow the use of another benchmark: International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, for the preparation of financial statements by publicly held companies.

Will the U.S. follow suit? In 2016, the Chief Accountant of the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant, Wes Bricker seemed to throw cold water on that possibility, noting that it wasn’t likely “in the foreseeable future.”

Play nice with each other, says SEC

But Bricker did encourage the U.S. accounting standards setter FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) and the European International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to work together to eliminate differences when it’s in the best interest of capital markets. And, the SEC is still talking about allowing domestic issuers to voluntarily submit IFRS financial information, without reconciliation, in addition to their U.S. GAAP financial statements.

“It doesn’t look like the U.S. will fully adopt IFRS, but standard-setting bodies here and in the EU still appear to be working on some degree of convergence, so there’ll be less difference between the two systems,” observed Ed O’Connell, an East Brunswick-based partner with the regional CPA and advisory firm WithumSmith+Brown PC. “As part of that convergence initiative, many publicly held companies had to make some technical changes in the way they report revenue for annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2017. All other entities, including privately held businesses that issue financial statements, will generally adopt the new standards for annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2018.”

More changes ahead

The highly technical changes may tweak the timing of when a company can recognize revenue.

“While some companies may not see much of an impact from the new revenue recognition standard, certain industries including software companies, construction companies, technology and life-science companies may be affected,” O’Connell added. “Either way, revenue recognition is a big topic and every company should speak with their CPA or other accounting advisor and consider whether they need to make changes to the way they’re accounting for and reporting their revenue.”


A big difference between IFRS and U.S. GAAP is that IFRS is based on principles, which can allow for different ways of reporting similar transactions, while GAAP is primarily rules-based, according to Ravi Raghunathan, a Roseland-based partner with CohnReznick, an international accounting, tax and business advisory firm. Raghunathan serves as the firm’s life sciences industry leader and heads its New Jersey technology practice.

“So under U.S. GAAP, if you’re looking for a specific answer to an accounting-related question or treatment of a transaction, you’ll probably find it in one or more of the GAAP rules, which encompass some 25,000 pages,” he reported. “The same question under IFRS, though, would be answered by considering the principles involved — which are covered by about 2,500 pages of literature — and then crafting an answer, which may vary by country in some cases.”

Because GAAP is more rules-based, detailed footnote explanations on financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP tend to be shorter than ones prepared under IFRS, Raghunathan added.

The new revenue recognition standards however, are only the first of a one-two punch. “For fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2018, many public companies will generally have to change the way they account for leases,” O’Connell reported. “The new lease standard introduces some technical changes, but could also result in many companies recognizing a significant portion of their lease activity on the balance sheet, as well as the income statement.” For private companies, the new standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2019.

This convergence of standards will also affect companies with international operations.

“If you’re a U.S. based company with only domestic operations, then you’ve likely always reported under GAAP and will continue to do so, although you have to make some modifications for the new standards,” he explained. “Likewise, for European companies, you’ll continue to report under IFRS. But U.S. companies with a European subsidiary, or European-based firms with a U.S. subsidiary that has to report under GAAP (not all of them have to, under U.S. rules) will likely continue to engage in some conversion from one format to the other.”

Back to school for private companies

WithumSmith+Brown audits companies with dual reporting requirements, said O’Connell.

“We have a dedicated group that focuses on these kinds of engagements, so we are on top of any changes,” he said. “Some smaller, privately held companies, though, may not be up to speed on the convergence changes, but their bankers and investors are, and if they’re getting financial statements from the firm — perhaps because of a financing arrangement — the bank or other lender will likely expect to see the new standards reflected in the financials. So some companies may get an unexpected wake-up call.”

For a period of time, it looked like the federal Securities and Exchange Commission was leaning towards a full-blown adoption of IFRS, “but the agency cooled on that idea and instead swung towards convergence, making the standards more consistent, if not quite identical,” said David Schmid, the Florham Park-based international accounting leader of PricewaterhouseCoopers. “Some differences, though remain.”

In addition to revenue recognition, and lease-accounting standards — which have been modified to bring the standards a bit closer — differences include the way that companies need to write down, or reduce the balance sheet value, of certain assets that are deemed to be impaired.

“Inventory accounting is another area of difference, said Schmid. “Under GAAP, most companies can use the [last in, first out] method, but that’s not permitted under IFRS.”

Some multinational companies must report under both methods, and that can add to the complexity — and fee — of an audit, he noted.

“Any time you have to do two types of reporting and build additional processes and controls, that provides a fair amount of additional work,” he said.

In an increasingly unified global economy, does it still make sense to maintain two kinds of accounting systems?

“GAAP and IFRS were developed to meet the needs of their respective jurisdictions,” Schmid said. “So you really can’t say one’s better than the other. Right now, the U.S. capital market offers certain efficiencies, so there’s no rush for U.S. companies to leave here and raise capital overseas, which would likely require them to adopt IFRS. But if that situation ever changes significantly, we could see a shift to IFRS. But in the meantime, we’re still in a globally connected environment, so it’s still a good idea to be familiar with IFRS.”

You May Have Missed...

Write to the Editorial Department at editorial@njbiz.com

Leave a Comment


Please note: All comments will be reviewed and may take up to 24 hours to appear on the site.

Post Comment
View Comment Policy