Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Plus RSS

Editorial: Can’t ignore consequences of racist campaign rhetoric

For almost a year now, the mainstream media outlets have been asking themselves how this could have happened; “this,” of course, is the popular wave upon which Donald Trump became president. And it’s not his policies they’re talking about, it’s the racist comments he made on the campaign trail and continues to sprinkle about on Twitter.

Very often, the conclusion is that this is a problem in those great flyover states, as a result of too many opioids, and not enough jobs or education, as a desperate mass of people backed an outsider in hopes of improving their own standing. But after the just-concluded election season here in New Jersey, you can’t make the argument anymore that this isn’t a problem here in the Garden State.

In the gubernatorial election, Kim Guadagno distinguished herself with a campaign commercial implying her opponent would have defended and protected the violent gangsters who shot four college students in Newark. In fact, the footage used in the ad was not related to the triple murder, but it certainly stoked fears that Phil Murphy’s “sanctuary state” would make New Jersey a haven for criminals. Local races were even worse — the Edison race for board of education candidates got national attention when a flyer urged voters to “make Edison great again” and placed stamps reading “deport” over the faces of two Asian candidates. Meanwhile, in Hoboken, a city no stranger to bare-knuckle electoral politics, the mayoral race to succeed Dawn Zimmer has featured some horrific stuff, including fliers denoting a shadowy network between one candidate and a group of unnamed-but-sinister-looking crime boss people, and a repurposed flyer with the words “Don’t let terrorism take over our town” above a photo of the race’s only Sikh candidate.

Who cares, though? Isn’t this just more of the same stuff that pokes its head out every November, only to retreat when the ballots have been cast? Sorry, but no; elections, as CNN and the rest will tell you, have definite consequences. By ignoring this kind of talk, we risk real consequences in our state and in our communities — especially to our businesses, which can ill afford such hostility to minorities in an overwhelmingly diverse region. This is clearly a problem in New Jersey, and until we have a serious dialog about it, residents should be careful about turning their noses up at their neighbors in the Midwest.

The elections may be over, but the problem is not. We hope the victors appreciate the gravity of the situation and work to confront these dreadful attitudes.

Also Popular on NJBIZ

Leave a Comment

test

Please note: All comments will be reviewed and may take up to 24 hours to appear on the site.

Post Comment
View Comment Policy

Comments

Bob November 13, 2017 3:38 pm

After the recent election, NJ will continue to own the top spot as the exporter of taxable income. Taxing your way to prosperity doesn't work. The last Goldman Sachs Governor proved that. Now the new one will experience this phenomenon for himself as he forces the successful class to once again, "pay just a little bit more". In 1978 NJ instituted a "temporary" state income tax of 2.5%. The state suffers from terminal liberalism. So happy to be a PA resident!

Thomas Patel November 13, 2017 9:16 am

You forgot about these campaign ads, fueled by Trump's neo-nationalism. Edison Police have conveniently not had any leads.

close