ERROR: Macro njDefaultArticleHeader is missing!

Falling in and out of alliances

By

Back to Top Comments Email Print

Latest News

Corporate America Realty & Advisors leases Little Falls industrial site

By Elana Knopp
May 23, 2018 12:48 PM

Rutherford-based Corporate America Realty & Advisors President Howard Applebaum recently represented H.C. International Inc. in an industrial lease agreement in Little Falls. CONTINUE READING

Princeton-based drug researcher opens Tokyo office

By Vince Calio
May 22, 2018 11:17 AM

WIRB-Copernicus Group, a Princeton-based medical research group, has opened a Tokyo office to expand its capabilities in conducting global clinical trials. CONTINUE READING

advertisement

Advance Realty Executive Quarters at Bedminster wins TOBY award

By Elana Knopp
May 22, 2018 07:20 AM

Advance Realty Executive Quarters at Bedminster has been named The Outstanding Building of the Year by the New Jersey chapter of the Building Owners and Managers Association. CONTINUE READING

Marcus & Millichap completes sale of Union City mixed-use building

By Elana Knopp
May 22, 2018 01:01 PM

Marcus & Millichap recently wrapped up the sale of a mixed-use building in Union City for almost $1.8 million. CONTINUE READING

NAI Hanson negotiates sale of Elmwood Park industrial/flex facility

By Elana Knopp
May 22, 2018 11:47 AM

NAI James E. Hanson real estate firm has negotiated the sale of a 45,000-square-foot industrial/flex building in Elmwood Park. CONTINUE READING

Hackensack Performing Arts Center wins Historic Preservation Award

By Elana Knopp
May 22, 2018 11:22 AM

The DMR Architects-designed Hackensack Performing Arts Center recently received the 2018 Bergen County Historic Preservation Award for its adaptive reuse of the former Masonic Temple in downtown Hackensack. CONTINUE READING

Cohen Seglias expands New Jersey office

By Gabrielle Saulsbery
May 21, 2018 01:45 PM

Three attorneys had joined Cohen, Seglias, Pallas, Greenhall & Furman PC’s Newark office. CONTINUE READING

advertisement

In 2000, I tried out for the second season of reality TV show “Survivor.” The process required a written application plus a short video. The most interesting aspect of the first season was the formation of alliances. It no longer mattered about individual skill or strength but the ability to form—and keep—an alliance. For my application, I was sure I had an alliance-centric winning entry.

My entire video was about how I don't have a sense of smell and therefore people would want to align with me because I would do any and all smelly tasks. Who would you rather be with in a rancid jungle or on a stinky island than an anosmic?

It was clear from the first season that people were typecast: the jerk, the sweet All-American girl, the schemer, the peacemaker, the tough guy, the executive, etc. Because, you know, reality can be boring but scripts—even the loose ones used for reality TV—can be exciting. I figured I had an absolute in…I mean, how many anosmics would be among the deluge of hopeful applicants back when the show was a blockbuster?

I didn't get picked (but the fun and frivolity of filming the tryout video with college pals made up for it). I was reminded of all of this recently because of the conversations that Managing Editor Joe St. Arney and I have been having with sources for our 25th anniversary edition. We are working on people lists for the issue, a bit like our Power lists.

These conversations often uncover "falling outs": people who were once close but no longer are, or people who are publicly close but really hate each other. (It's good stuff—way better than "Survivor" ever was, or at least the only two seasons I ever watched.) In one conversation, I blurted, "I don't get it. I'm 44 and I've never had a 'falling out' with anyone, not at work nor among friends. I've had friendships fade away but never a 'falling out.'" The person shot back: "Have you ever been involved in politics?" I have not.

Paint me naïve, but it still surprises me that politics and the business world can be so cut-throat. We're not talking about obvious enemies; we're talking about people on the same team—same company or same political party or whatever.

It got me thinking. I had never thought about it but had just subconsciously assumed I never had had a falling out with anyone because I'm basically a decent person. But maybe something else is at work. Maybe people stick with me because they reek and I just don't know it.

If so, then based on my track record in reality, I could have won it all on "Survivor."

Share This Story On:

Falling in and out of alliances

By

Back to Top Comments Email Print

Latest News

advertisement

In 2000, I tried out for the second season of reality TV show “Survivor.” The process required a written application plus a short video. The most interesting aspect of the first season was the formation of alliances. It no longer mattered about individual skill or strength but the ability to form—and keep—an alliance. For my application, I was sure I had an alliance-centric winning entry.

My entire video was about how I don't have a sense of smell and therefore people would want to align with me because I would do any and all smelly tasks. Who would you rather be with in a rancid jungle or on a stinky island than an anosmic?

It was clear from the first season that people were typecast: the jerk, the sweet All-American girl, the schemer, the peacemaker, the tough guy, the executive, etc. Because, you know, reality can be boring but scripts—even the loose ones used for reality TV—can be exciting. I figured I had an absolute in…I mean, how many anosmics would be among the deluge of hopeful applicants back when the show was a blockbuster?

I didn't get picked (but the fun and frivolity of filming the tryout video with college pals made up for it). I was reminded of all of this recently because of the conversations that Managing Editor Joe St. Arney and I have been having with sources for our 25th anniversary edition. We are working on people lists for the issue, a bit like our Power lists.

These conversations often uncover "falling outs": people who were once close but no longer are, or people who are publicly close but really hate each other. (It's good stuff—way better than "Survivor" ever was, or at least the only two seasons I ever watched.) In one conversation, I blurted, "I don't get it. I'm 44 and I've never had a 'falling out' with anyone, not at work nor among friends. I've had friendships fade away but never a 'falling out.'" The person shot back: "Have you ever been involved in politics?" I have not.

Paint me naïve, but it still surprises me that politics and the business world can be so cut-throat. We're not talking about obvious enemies; we're talking about people on the same team—same company or same political party or whatever.

It got me thinking. I had never thought about it but had just subconsciously assumed I never had had a falling out with anyone because I'm basically a decent person. But maybe something else is at work. Maybe people stick with me because they reek and I just don't know it.

If so, then based on my track record in reality, I could have won it all on "Survivor."

Share This Story On:
advertisement

Comments


Be the first to comment.



Please note: All comments will be reviewed and may take up to 24 hours to appear on the site.

Post Comment
     View Comment Policy
advertisement
ERROR: Macro defaultSidebar is missing!
ERROR: Macro footer_top is missing!
Back to Top