ERROR: Macro njDefaultArticleHeader is missing!

Falling in and out of alliances

By

Back to Top Comments Email Print

Latest News

Software solutions firm hires CFO

By Eric Strauss
April 26, 2017 11:35 AM

Princeton-based business software solutions provider AMERI Holdings Inc. has named a new chief financial officer, it said Tuesday. CONTINUE READING

Marcus & Millichap completes sale in Elizabeth

By Mario Marroquin
April 26, 2017 12:06 PM

Commercial real estate firm Marcus & Millichap recently announced the completion of a $1.4 million property sale in Elizabeth through a 1031 exchange. Michael Lombardi, first vice president at Marcus & Millichap New Jersey’s office, represented private investors in the sale and purchase of the property. CONTINUE READING

advertisement

Binary Tree promotes new CEO

By Emily Bader
April 25, 2017 03:13 PM

Kendall Park-based Binary Tree announced recently it has promoted its chief operating officer, Nick Wilkinson, to CEO. CONTINUE READING

Phila. Fed report: Outlook on nonmanufacturing business remains strong

By NJBIZ STAFF
April 25, 2017 01:07 PM

Businesses in the South Jersey area have confidence the economy is improving, according to the latest monthly report by the Federal Reserve in Philadelphia. CONTINUE READING

Barnes & Noble Education hires chief legal officer

By Eric Strauss
April 25, 2017 12:54 PM

Barnes & Noble Education Inc., based in Basking Ridge, has named a new chief legal officer and vice president of corporate affairs, it announced Tuesday. CONTINUE READING

Pinnacle promotes some EVPs to expanded roles

By Eric Strauss
April 25, 2017 11:14 AM

Parsippany-based Pinnacle Foods Inc. has made some changes at the executive vice president level, it announced Monday. CONTINUE READING

SITO Mobile names chief operating officer

By Eric Strauss
April 25, 2017 11:38 AM

Jersey City-based mobile engagement platform SITO Mobile Ltd. promoted an executive to chief operating officer, it announced Tuesday. CONTINUE READING

advertisement

In 2000, I tried out for the second season of reality TV show “Survivor.” The process required a written application plus a short video. The most interesting aspect of the first season was the formation of alliances. It no longer mattered about individual skill or strength but the ability to form—and keep—an alliance. For my application, I was sure I had an alliance-centric winning entry.

My entire video was about how I don't have a sense of smell and therefore people would want to align with me because I would do any and all smelly tasks. Who would you rather be with in a rancid jungle or on a stinky island than an anosmic?

It was clear from the first season that people were typecast: the jerk, the sweet All-American girl, the schemer, the peacemaker, the tough guy, the executive, etc. Because, you know, reality can be boring but scripts—even the loose ones used for reality TV—can be exciting. I figured I had an absolute in…I mean, how many anosmics would be among the deluge of hopeful applicants back when the show was a blockbuster?

I didn't get picked (but the fun and frivolity of filming the tryout video with college pals made up for it). I was reminded of all of this recently because of the conversations that Managing Editor Joe St. Arney and I have been having with sources for our 25th anniversary edition. We are working on people lists for the issue, a bit like our Power lists.

These conversations often uncover "falling outs": people who were once close but no longer are, or people who are publicly close but really hate each other. (It's good stuff—way better than "Survivor" ever was, or at least the only two seasons I ever watched.) In one conversation, I blurted, "I don't get it. I'm 44 and I've never had a 'falling out' with anyone, not at work nor among friends. I've had friendships fade away but never a 'falling out.'" The person shot back: "Have you ever been involved in politics?" I have not.

Paint me naïve, but it still surprises me that politics and the business world can be so cut-throat. We're not talking about obvious enemies; we're talking about people on the same team—same company or same political party or whatever.

It got me thinking. I had never thought about it but had just subconsciously assumed I never had had a falling out with anyone because I'm basically a decent person. But maybe something else is at work. Maybe people stick with me because they reek and I just don't know it.

If so, then based on my track record in reality, I could have won it all on "Survivor."

Share This Story On:

Falling in and out of alliances

By

Back to Top Comments Email Print

Latest News

advertisement

In 2000, I tried out for the second season of reality TV show “Survivor.” The process required a written application plus a short video. The most interesting aspect of the first season was the formation of alliances. It no longer mattered about individual skill or strength but the ability to form—and keep—an alliance. For my application, I was sure I had an alliance-centric winning entry.

My entire video was about how I don't have a sense of smell and therefore people would want to align with me because I would do any and all smelly tasks. Who would you rather be with in a rancid jungle or on a stinky island than an anosmic?

It was clear from the first season that people were typecast: the jerk, the sweet All-American girl, the schemer, the peacemaker, the tough guy, the executive, etc. Because, you know, reality can be boring but scripts—even the loose ones used for reality TV—can be exciting. I figured I had an absolute in…I mean, how many anosmics would be among the deluge of hopeful applicants back when the show was a blockbuster?

I didn't get picked (but the fun and frivolity of filming the tryout video with college pals made up for it). I was reminded of all of this recently because of the conversations that Managing Editor Joe St. Arney and I have been having with sources for our 25th anniversary edition. We are working on people lists for the issue, a bit like our Power lists.

These conversations often uncover "falling outs": people who were once close but no longer are, or people who are publicly close but really hate each other. (It's good stuff—way better than "Survivor" ever was, or at least the only two seasons I ever watched.) In one conversation, I blurted, "I don't get it. I'm 44 and I've never had a 'falling out' with anyone, not at work nor among friends. I've had friendships fade away but never a 'falling out.'" The person shot back: "Have you ever been involved in politics?" I have not.

Paint me naïve, but it still surprises me that politics and the business world can be so cut-throat. We're not talking about obvious enemies; we're talking about people on the same team—same company or same political party or whatever.

It got me thinking. I had never thought about it but had just subconsciously assumed I never had had a falling out with anyone because I'm basically a decent person. But maybe something else is at work. Maybe people stick with me because they reek and I just don't know it.

If so, then based on my track record in reality, I could have won it all on "Survivor."

Share This Story On:
advertisement

Comments


Be the first to comment.



Please note: All comments will be reviewed and may take up to 24 hours to appear on the site.

Post Comment
     View Comment Policy
advertisement
ERROR: Macro defaultSidebar is missing!
ERROR: Macro footer_top is missing!
Back to Top